<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The New England Geek</title>
	<link>http://www.negeek.com</link>
	<description>At the crossroads of technology, culture, and politics in the northeast.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>ZDNet Still Doesn&#8217;t Understand that OpenDocument is not Open Source</title>
		<link>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-22-zdnet-still-doesnt-understand-that-opendocument-is-not-open-source.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-22-zdnet-still-doesnt-understand-that-opendocument-is-not-open-source.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		
	<category>General</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-22-zdnet-still-doesnt-understand-that-opendocument-is-not-open-source.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Massachussets is mandating Open Document as it&#8217;s document format for the simple utility of it&#8217;s available, non-changing standard.
ZDNet still doesn&#8217;t understand what the differences between open source software and an open standard are&#8230; they don&#8217;t equate.
Open source is a way to license your software for distribution to others.  Generally it preserves the receivers right [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Massachussets is mandating Open Document as it&#8217;s document format for the simple utility of it&#8217;s available, non-changing standard.</p>
<p>ZDNet still doesn&#8217;t understand what the differences between open source software and an open standard are&#8230; they don&#8217;t equate.</p>
<p>Open source is a way to license your software for distribution to others.  Generally it preserves the receivers right to get a crack at the source code (open&#8230; <em>source</em>, get it?).</p>
<p>Open standards are ways of doing things (standards) that are either free to license or licensed for a standard set fee to all commers.  Hence open.  They&#8217;re generally freely availble to view in either case.</p>
<p>Open Document Format is a specific open standard.</p>
<p>You also might note that there is no specification as to what will <em>work with</em> the ODF files.  The article referenced implies that Open Office is the only option, which is far from the truth.  Mass spec&#8217;d out a standard for their documentation, not an &#8220;office suite&#8221; to use that standard with.<br />
<a href="http://www.negeek.com/wp-admin/http3A2F2Fblogs.zdnet.com2Fopen-source2F3Fp3D755">OpenDocument Ref&#8217;d as Open Source<br />
</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-22-zdnet-still-doesnt-understand-that-opendocument-is-not-open-source.html/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Had Enough of this So-Called &#8220;Googling&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-15-googles-had-enough-of-this-so-called-googling.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-15-googles-had-enough-of-this-so-called-googling.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 02:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Google</category>
	<category>Liberty</category>
	<category>Legal</category>
	<category>journalism</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-15-googles-had-enough-of-this-so-called-googling.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an effort to show that the term &#8220;googling&#8221; isn&#8217;t ubiquitous for search Google is trying to stifle the press from using it.
They&#8217;ve asked very politely that the various wonks and journalist out there not use the term &#8220;googling&#8221; repeatedly to refer to generic search.  Such as &#8220;did you google that chick&#8221; or &#8220;I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an effort to show that the term &#8220;googling&#8221; isn&#8217;t ubiquitous for search Google is trying to stifle the press from using it.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve asked very politely that the various wonks and journalist out there not use the term &#8220;googling&#8221; repeatedly to refer to generic search.  Such as &#8220;did you google that chick&#8221; or &#8220;I just googled duck flambey&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you can all come up with many, many more posts just to show them exactly how wide spread the use of the term is.  Generecide just sounds so&#8230; tasty.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2162290/stop-googling-things-google">Stop Googling! Says Google</a> <-fixed link
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-15-googles-had-enough-of-this-so-called-googling.html/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Least I Could Do » Home Page</title>
		<link>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-15-least-i-could-do-%c2%bb-home-page.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-15-least-i-could-do-%c2%bb-home-page.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Geeky</category>
	<category>Humor</category>
	<category>PC</category>
	<category>comics</category>
	<category>Apple</category>
	<category>webcomic</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-15-least-i-could-do-%c2%bb-home-page.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally something funny I can post in the &#8220;geeky&#8221; column.  Although it might not be work safe humor&#8230; I know how un-humorous those workplaces are getting these days.
Unless you&#8217;re in Holland, where I hear the double entendre is still alive and well.
Least I Could Do » Apple vs Mac


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally something funny I can post in the &#8220;geeky&#8221; column.  Although it might not be work safe humor&#8230; I know how un-humorous those workplaces are getting these days.</p>
<p>Unless you&#8217;re in Holland, where I hear the double entendre is still alive and well.</p>
<p><a href="http://leasticoulddo.com/index2.php?date=20060815">Least I Could Do » Apple vs Mac<br />
</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-15-least-i-could-do-%c2%bb-home-page.html/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Official: RIAA to Sue the Dead</title>
		<link>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-14-official-riaa-to-sue-the-dead.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-14-official-riaa-to-sue-the-dead.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 02:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Legal</category>
	<category>Music</category>
	<category>Copyright</category>
	<category>RIAA</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-14-official-riaa-to-sue-the-dead.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what&#8217;s definitely a &#8220;News of the Weird&#8221; piece the RIAA is going to actually sue the deceased.  Couldn&#8217;t make that one up if I tried.
RIAA defendant dies, heirs given 60 days to grieve before depositions

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what&#8217;s definitely a &#8220;News of the Weird&#8221; piece the RIAA is going to actually sue the deceased.  Couldn&#8217;t make that one up if I tried.</p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060812-7487.html">RIAA defendant dies, heirs given 60 days to grieve before depositions</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-14-official-riaa-to-sue-the-dead.html/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mentally Vacant</title>
		<link>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-11-mentally-vacant.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-11-mentally-vacant.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		
	<category>blogging</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-11-mentally-vacant.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been on vaction for a bit and am pretty mentally absent just now. There&#8217;s nothing to post, really.
All of that good stuff I thought of to interest you while riding in the car for 12 bloody hours at a clip is all gone. But I&#8217;ll probably remember it after some sleep, food, beer, more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been on vaction for a bit and am pretty mentally absent just now. There&#8217;s nothing to post, really.</p>
<p>All of that good stuff I thought of to interest you while riding in the car for <em>12 bloody hours</em> at a clip is all gone. But I&#8217;ll probably remember it after some sleep, food, beer, more sleep, coffee, hacking, sleeping, well.. you get the idea, right?</p>
<p>At any rate I&#8217;m absenting myself for a few days to come up with some fresh angles.  And pictures.  There will <em>definitely</em> be pictures.</p>
<p>So.  Until I&#8217;ve got some witty reparte to again divert your attention for a few minutes&#8230;</p>
<p>Be back later!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-11-mentally-vacant.html/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Feature Would Make You Buy a Car</title>
		<link>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-11-what-feature-would-make-you-buy-a-car.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-11-what-feature-would-make-you-buy-a-car.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Humor</category>
	<category>media</category>
	<category>webcomic</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-11-what-feature-would-make-you-buy-a-car.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t know about you, but a Decepticon emblem embossed on the hood would be a pretty big selling point.
And I didn&#8217;t even like the Transformers when I was a kid&#8230;
Least I Could Do » Home Page

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but a Decepticon emblem embossed on the hood would be a pretty big selling point.</p>
<p>And I didn&#8217;t even <i>like</i> the Transformers when I was a kid&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.leasticoulddo.com/index2.php?date=20060811">Least I Could Do » Home Page</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-11-what-feature-would-make-you-buy-a-car.html/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A non-free web? at Entropy</title>
		<link>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-07-a-non-free-web-at-entropy.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-07-a-non-free-web-at-entropy.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Tech</category>
	<category>Software</category>
	<category>GNU</category>
	<category>gmail</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-07-a-non-free-web-at-entropy.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Couldn&#8217;t resist picking on this one.  To say that we should all bow before the ideology layed down by the FSF and that &#8220;well, if the FSF doesn&#8217;t say it ain&#8217;t so, then it ain&#8217;t&#8221; is a bit far fetched.  Just because the FSF doesn&#8217;t say &#8220;gmail is a problem, you should all not use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t resist picking on this one.  To say that we should all bow before the ideology layed down by the FSF and that &#8220;well, if the FSF doesn&#8217;t say it ain&#8217;t so, then it ain&#8217;t&#8221; is a bit far fetched.  Just because the FSF doesn&#8217;t say &#8220;gmail is a problem, you should all not use it&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean that there isn&#8217;t a conflict between source code liberated software and the gmail service.  To wit, it&#8217;s not open source, software libre, give-all-your-code-to-me-you-proprietary-person in any way shape or form.</p>
<p>So I can see where someone with a &#8220;all software code should be &#8220;free&#8221;" attitude might take issue with it. I&#8217;m not of that attitude myself, I think you should be free to license what you program in any way you&#8217;d like.  But I can understand the stance, leastways.<br />
Personally, I&#8217;ll stick to doing what I think is right and let the FSF worry about how they&#8217;re going to get people to adopt the upcoming GPL v3.  Who knows, maybe they&#8217;ll have to accept that the ability to sell software/support/services is vital to the creation of said software (I overstate on purpose, but still).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always found the GPL to be a convenient, widespread license.  But I&#8217;ve never thought it to be an *ideal* license, just a good compromise that I can live with.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dylanknightrogers.com/2006/08/07/a-non-free-web/">A non-free web? at Entropy</a><br />
I’m not responsible for the software installed on someone else’s machine, especially if it’s a server. If it were the opposite case, the Free Software Foundation would advise people to use Netcraft to check every web site they visit to make sure that the server is running a free operating system. A waste of time.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-07-a-non-free-web-at-entropy.html/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back from Otakon</title>
		<link>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-07-back-from-otakon.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-07-back-from-otakon.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 18:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		
	<category>General</category>
	<category>Culture</category>
	<category>Entertainment</category>
	<category>convention</category>
	<category>comics</category>
	<category>media</category>
	<category>anime</category>
	<category>baltimore</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-07-back-from-otakon.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Otakon, if you didn&#8217;t know, is a gathering of Anime fans down in Baltimore.
While I wouldn&#8217;t say I&#8217;m an &#8220;anime fan&#8221; or fanatic of any sort I&#8217;ve been known to appreciate the full length animated feature, usually Japanese, on occasion.  On more occasions than a full length non-animated feature, in fact.
Which is what led [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Otakon, if you didn&#8217;t know, is a gathering of Anime fans down in Baltimore.</p>
<p>While I wouldn&#8217;t say I&#8217;m an &#8220;anime fan&#8221; or fanatic of any sort I&#8217;ve been known to appreciate the full length animated feature, usually Japanese, on occasion.  On more occasions than a full length non-animated feature, in fact.</p>
<p>Which is what led me to Otakon.  That and ttilley calling me up and yelling &#8220;Otakon!!! Wooo!&#8221; with such enthusiasm that I couldn&#8217;t say no.</p>
<p>The convention itself is a blast to wander around, with people dressed in all kinds of costumes.  Dealers of both art and goods are present, though not in the quantities that I gather are at Japanese conventions of this type.</p>
<p>Overall the character of the show is an amalgamation of &#8220;things to do&#8221; and &#8220;people to do them with&#8221; that works out pretty well.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;ve got some pictures for you all, only not right now.  And some witty editorial.  Once again, not right now.</p>
<p>In the meantime I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll have something for you to peruse on the <a target="blank" href="http://www.otakon.com/default2.asp">Otakon website</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-07-back-from-otakon.html/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public Relations Firm Astroturfs Al Gore&#8217;s Inconvenient Truth Video</title>
		<link>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-07-public-relations-firm-astroturfs-al-gores-inconvenient-truth-video.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-07-public-relations-firm-astroturfs-al-gores-inconvenient-truth-video.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 14:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		
	<category>General</category>
	<category>News</category>
	<category>Advertising</category>
	<category>mediasploitation</category>
	<category>environment</category>
	<category>astroturfing</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-07-public-relations-firm-astroturfs-al-gores-inconvenient-truth-video.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that the oil companies will stop at nothing to cover up the whole &#8220;world getting warmer&#8221; bit.  A public relations firm is astroturfing a anti-&#8221;Inconvenient Truth&#8221; video on YouTube in an attempt to fight back against accusations of warming the planet.
Ever see one of those goofie kids shows where evil villians with some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that the oil companies will stop at nothing to cover up the whole &#8220;world getting warmer&#8221; bit.  A public relations firm is astroturfing a anti-&#8221;Inconvenient Truth&#8221; video on YouTube in an attempt to fight back against accusations of warming the planet.</p>
<p>Ever see one of those goofie kids shows where evil villians with some bizarre motive (or aliens, take your pick) are trying to destroy the planet?</p>
<p>Yea.  I always thought those were a little odd too.</p>
<p>Apparently, though, someone took them on as roll models.  It&#8217;s a weird world we live in.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06215/710851-115.stm">Where did that video spoofing Gore&#8217;s film come from?</a><br />
Instead, the email originated from a computer registered to DCI Group, a Washington, D.C., public relations and lobbying firm whose clients include oil company Exxon Mobil Corp.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-07-public-relations-firm-astroturfs-al-gores-inconvenient-truth-video.html/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lax Entertainment Ethic</title>
		<link>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-04-lax-entertainment-ethic.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-04-lax-entertainment-ethic.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 13:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		
	<category>General</category>
	<category>Humor</category>
	<category>Entertainment</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-04-lax-entertainment-ethic.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve discovered I have a lax entertainment ethic.
That&#8217;s right.  Entertainment ethic.  You&#8217;ve seen people with a very strong entertainment ethic.  They might be standing in front of you in the line having gotten up early just to see this show.  They&#8217;re the ones that have to be on time just to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve discovered I have a lax entertainment ethic.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s right.  Entertainment ethic.  You&#8217;ve seen people with a very <em>strong</em> entertainment ethic.  They might be standing in front of you in the line having gotten up early <em>just to see this show</em>.  They&#8217;re the ones that have to be on time just to be <em>entertained</em>.</p>
<p>This is not for me.</p>
<p>Now, work ethic I have no problem with.  I show up relatively on time and put in as much effort as necessary to get the job done.  Maybe a little more if it&#8217;s an interesting problem.</p>
<p>But entertainment ethic, the idea that I&#8217;m going to put <em>real effort</em> into the acquisition and maintenece of a boredom staving lifestyle is a foreign concept to me.  <em>Hurrying up</em> to make it to somewhere to be <em>entertained</em> just doesn&#8217;t do it for me.</p>
<p>Which is why the potential of getting tickets for Otakon, which ttilley is insisting we go to (hey. what. The goofie costumes people wear are fun), is brought into doubt.</p>
<p>In conclusion I leave these words of wisdom.  It&#8217;s Friday, relax.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.negeek.com/2006-08-04-lax-entertainment-ethic.html/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
